The 1960s was a politically charged decade of revolution and change. Apollo
11 became the first capsule to land on the moon, the Civil Rights Act of 1964
became law, Vietnam was raging, Beatlemania was sweeping the world, birth control
pills hit the market, and a new cult of youth, known as “Youthquake,” had
radically taken over many areas of life. In the midst of these dramatic political
and cultural changes emerged one of the most enduring and controversial icons
of the era: the miniskirt (or mini skirt).
Existing, surprisingly, since
ancient times, this small and sexy piece of fabric has embodied some of the
most fascinating paradoxes of our times as it suggests both empowerment and
vulnerability, independence and a desire to please, an attempt to cover and
to reveal, maturity and playfulness, and liberation and exploitation. Simultaneously
condemned and loved, the miniskirt exploded into the political landscape
and had women (and men) suddenly paying attention to what had been hidden
years before—a woman’s legs.
In the Beginning Was
. . . the Miniskirt
High in the mountains in some of Europe’s
oldest villages, archaeologists have recently unearthed ancient figurines
dating between 5400-4700 B.C. What is remarkable about the figurines
is not only their age, but also that the female figurines appear to
be beautifully dressed in miniskirts not unlike the fashionable miniskirts
of the 1960s, prompting some scholars to speculate that miniskirts
were common in the earliest of civilizations (Derbyshire 2007). Interestingly,
these figurines are not the only evidence of “ancient miniskirts.
For example, an ancient Egyptian fresco shows a female acrobatic dancer
wearing a “mini skirt” seemingly made out of cotton that
shows off both her hips and her legs (Gandolfi 1989).
Early
Twentieth-Century Skirts and Sowing the Seeds of Change
While
the miniskirt may have existed as long as civilization has, it
is probably only recently that it has evoked powerful political
and cultural implications. In the mid 1800s, women in Europe
and America were generally believed to be the weaker and more
vulnerable sex. Politics, business, and physical activity could
be dangerous for women, and tight corsets with long, restrictive
skirts generally reflected these beliefs (Weaver 2003).
 |
 |
 |
| Like the miniskirt, the 1920s flapper conveyed an impression of a “new“ woman |
 |
|
After
WWI, however, advances in women's emancipation and post-war
escapism led to the “flapper” style, an androgynous
style with hemlines up to a woman’s knee. After dropping
to a more sober calf length during the early 1930s, hemlines
rose to just below the knee during WWII, partly due to mandatory
fabric rationing during the war (Lehnert 2000). After
the end of wartime restrictions on cloth, women were ready
for elegance and femininity, and the fashion industry promoted
the “New Look” epitomized by Christian Dior.
The New Look was mature and sophisticated, with an exaggerated
hourglass figure and long, lavish hemlines (Steele 1997).
While the New Look reflected the “best years of our
life” consumerism that followed WWII, the “teddy
boys” and beatniks of the Beat generation were already
sowing the seeds of discontent in 1950s materialism—a
discontent that would find its full voice in the 1960s and
dramatically change hemlines forever (Reilly 2003).
The
1960s and the Politics of the Miniskirt
Teenagers
Create Their Own Political (and Fashion) Space
Before
the 1960s, young women had been expected to dress
in the style of their mothers, which was usually
loosely based on Parisian couture. For example,
as late as 1962, a Sears catalog portrayed mothers
and daughters as “patchwork pals” who
were overjoyed that they are wearing identical
dresses. Looking back on the late 1950s, the English
designer Sally Tuffin remarked, “There weren’t
any clothes for young people at all. One just looked
like their mother” (Steele 1997).
However,
by the 1960s, youth protests and demands for
individual expression revealed that young adults
were gaining a self-conscious awareness of themselves
as a distinct and unified group that was able
to respond to political events in ways that were
different from their parents (Cawthorne 1999).
Youngsters felt they no longer needed to follow
the rules of bourgeois morality and manners,
which they saw as hypocritical and based on double
standards. As this young political entity gained
a voice, they created a space for a new and distinctive
fashion that embodied their own political views—not
their parents’.
The Miniskirt
as an Expression and Tool of 1960s Feminism
Growing
awareness of feminism also paved the way
for a different fashion for women. For
example, in 1963, American Betty Friedman
published The Feminine Mystique which
deconstructed the myth of the happy housewife
and expressed the desire of women to explore
other roles. In addition, the 1960s saw
a dramatic increase in women attending
universities and entering the workforce,
especially with the advent of the “temp
agency” which allowed greater flexibility
in when and where a woman wanted to work.
This
decade also saw laws passed that helped
protect and empower both married and
divorced women (Diamond and Diamond 2006).
Perhaps most important was the advent
of the birth control pill, which removed
fears of pregnancy and helped usher in
the sexual revolution (Cawthorne 1999).
The image of a woman was beginning to
dramatically shift from being a wife
and mother to a young, single, carefree
girl proud of her sexuality and confident
with her power. The miniskirt would express—and
serve as a tool for—this growing
woman’s movement.
A
New Class of Young Consumerism
The
young generation was indeed growing
up rebellious and articulate—and
with more money than they’ve
ever had before. Young people suddenly
became a powerful class of consumers
who demanded a fashion that matched
the spirit of youth. Consequently,
the whole structure of the fashion
system was challenged from the
youth in the streets as the prestige
of “couture” came under
attack or, worse, seemed irrelevant
(Cawthorne 1999). Upstart designers
and boutiques began to cater to
a new youth market that could now
buy what they wanted—and
to older women who began to scramble
to look like their daughters.
“The
Mother of the Miniskirt” :
Mary Quant
 |
 |
| Mary Quant helped launch the mini skirt revolution in the 1960s |
 |
|
 |
When a young upstart British designer named Mary Quant opened her
boutique Bazaar in 1955 on King’s Road (a mod and
rocker hangout), she was poised to spearhead a fashion revolution.
Without any real training in fashion, but with a finger on the
pulse of everyday fashion of the street, she represented a distinctive
breakaway in fashion. She began to sell clothes that reflected
the ideas of the day’s youth and that had nothing to do with
established Paris fashion houses (Lehnert 2000).
When she raised the hemline of her skirts in 1965 to several inches above the
knee, the iconic miniskirt was born. Named after her favorite car, the Mini,
the miniskirt was an instant success and epitomized the spirit of London in the
mid-60s: free, energetic, youthful, revolutionary, and unconventional (Diamond
and Diamond 2006).
“The
Lord of the Miniskirt” :
André Courrèges
Quant probably deserves primary but not exclusive credit for the miniskirt. One
French designer also caught the spirit of the era and did for France what Quant
did for England (and America)—André Courrèges. Though he
began to experiment with hemlines as early as 1961, Courrèges showcased
his futuristic, space-age minimalistic dresses which scandalously fell above
the knee in late 1964. Like Quant, Courrèges shocked the fashion world.
Unlike Quant, he tended to design his skirts with more sophistication and maturity,
which, in turn, helped make the miniskirt acceptable to French haute couture
(Cawthorne 1999).
While Courrèges
would later claim that
he invented the miniskirt,
Quant dismissed his
claim, saying “It
wasn’t me or
Courrèges who
invented the miniskirt
anyway—it was
the girls in the street
who did it.” Though
the debates between
Quant and Courrèges
can be amusing and
many scholars tend
to “skirt” the
issue, both Quant and
Courrèges appropriated
the trends of earlier
fashion houses and
both took advantage
of the greater social
changes that were occurring
around them. Regardless
of who really “invented” the
miniskirt, both Quant
and Courrèges
deserve credit for
revolutionizing and
enriching the fashion
world with their daring
hemlines (Diamond and
Diamond 2006).
The
Mini Goes International
Quant’s influential position in the heart of “Swinging London,” Courrèges’ influential
position in the more sophisticated Parisian fashion world, and the mini’s
easily washable fabric that busy teenage girls were apt to buy helped the miniskirt
become a major international trend. The miniskirt’s international acceptance
was also boosted when Jean Shrimpton, a popular model, unwittingly caused an
international stir in late 1965 when she wore a miniskirt with no stockings,
hat, or gloves at the Melbourne Cup Carnival in Australia (Steele 1997). The
classic photo of that day showed a dramatic contrast: behind the young, carefree,
and beautiful Shrimpton was a group of disapproving middle-aged women dressed
in their very proper twin sets and pearls. Shrimpton’s apparent disregard
for the bland status quo made a trend-setting fashion statement around the world
(in non-communistic and non-Muslim countries, at least).
Accessorizing
the Miniskirt
It wasn’t
just moral
outrage that
followed
the miniskirt,
but also
fashionable
accessories.
Accessories
included
zip-up knee
high boots
made of stretch
vinyl (“kinky” or
Courrèges’ “go-go” boots).
Tights and
pantyhose
replaced
awkward nylon
stockings
and became
fashion statements
in their
own right.
Actually,
tights and
pantyhose
are what
really made
the miniskirt
possible
because they
liberated
the woman
from garter
belts and
from trying
to keep the
lines on
old-fashioned
stockings
straight
(Olsen 1999).
By the
late
1960s,
miniskirts
were
being
made
of see-through
fabrics
and other
loose
crotchet
materials—which,
in turn,
made
underwear
an important
new accessory
in fashion
as well.
The “Lolita
Look”
 |
 |
 |
| Twiggy is an iconic “dolly bird“ and the face of the “Swinging 1960s“ |
 |
|
Ironically, the full sexuality of the miniskirt during the 1960s also played
on a “school-girl” image, and London became recognized as catering
almost exclusively to young girls between the ages of 15 and 20. The models
on all the popular catwalks and fashion magazines were typically skinny and
androgynous, with an almost prepubescent figure. Even Mary Quant’s
husband and partner, Alexander Plunket-Greene, told Rolling Stone in
1987 that “at the time, there was a slightly sort of pedophile thing
about it” (Cawthorne 1999). Indeed, the “Lolita look” was
everywhere, and the fashionable woman of the 1950s, “all high-heeled
and rock-hard tits,” was replaced by a London girl with a childish
shape and a “great deal of long legs” (Cawthorne 1999).
The
most famous model of the era was seventeen-year-old
Twiggy (Leslie Hornby), who had a short boyish
hairstyle, pale lips, and skinny figure (she was
5′ 7″ and weighed 99 pounds). Even though
the miniskirt initially was an expression of individuality,
women and girls alike copied Twiggy’s Vidal Sassoon
geometric bob and her heavily mascaraed eyelashes in
an attempt to achieve her “doe-eyed” little
girl look. When young girls mimicked Twiggy’s
fashionably gawky “broken limb” look, they
were said to resemble little shop dolls or mannequins
(White and Griffiths 2000). Not surprising, dieting
fads and eating
disorders skyrocketed during this decade (Lehnert
2000).
Decline
of the Mini in the
Late 1960s
The miniskirt of the “swinging 60s” lasted until the end of the decade.
Throughout, fashion designers created some new and extreme variations in order
to keep the excitement alive. For example, Paco Rabanne launched his plastic
chain-mail miniskirt in 1966 and then the throw-away minidress. Despite this
creativity, the mini eventually fell out of fashion when disillusionment about
Vietnam became more widespread and the future looked less positive.
With increasingly political despondency, fashion became a little more nostalgic
and hemlines fell back down to the ankle in 1969 in a style called the “maxi,” which
was the longest hemline since 1914 (Cawthorne 1999). In addition, while the miniskirt
initially was seen as liberating women, the development of terms such as “dolly
birds” tended to objectify women, and feminists realized that the miniskirt
had great potential to be more exploitive than liberating (Reilly 2003). With
the feminist movement in full swing by the early 1970s, minis (whose hemlines
had nowhere to go but down, anyway) fell into disfavor.
The
Late 1970s
Punk Revival
of the Mini
While the miniskirt fell out of fashion in the early
1970s, the punk movement at the end of the decade helped
revive the miniskirt, thanks in part to female rock stars
such as Debbie Harry (Blondie) who were fond of wearing
miniskirts on stage. The punks were motivated by anti-fashion
and tried to avoid mainstream trends, which were considered
bourgeois, bland, and over-indulgent.
Influenced by punk designers such as Vivienne Westwood and Malcolm McLaren, whose
shop SEX sold the fashion, the mini was reincarnated in black leather and PVC.
The mini was also now often worn with ripped fishnet tights and took on a slightly “trashy” overtone
that reflected the “whatever” attitude (Cawthorne 1999). In an ironic
twist of fashion, once the punk look was picked up by designers, the punk movement’s
anti-establishment edge became mainstream itself.
1980s
and
1990s:
The
Corporate
Miniskirt
 |
 |
| The miniskirt was part of the power suit trend in the 1980s and early 1990s |
 |
|
 |
The 1980s and early 1990s heralded a return to a more
womanly figure in contrast to the adolescent androgyny
of the 1960s. Rather than disappearing, however, the
miniskirt was incorporated into the new, big-shouldered, “power” business
suit for women, either in traditional pinstripes or
jewel-colored wools (Cawthorne 1999). Popular characters
in TV sitcoms such as Carrie in Sex in the City and
Heather Locklear in Melrose Place helped the
miniskirt appear sexy—and smart (Diamond and
Diamond 2006).
Miniskirts
were no longer considered appropriate only for teenagers, but they also became
a power statement for sophisticated, long-legged,
thirty-something career women who were in total control of their single life.
Mini Skirts around the World
For the most part, the miniskirt has been accepted in the Western world; however,
not all countries and cultures embraced the short skirt. Inmany African countries,
the miniskirt was seen not only as a corrupting influence of the West but alsoof
the modern world.
For example, in Tanzania in 1968, at least one barmaid was stoned by a mob that
supposedly disapproved of the shortness and tight fit of her miniskirt (Ross
2008), and politicians argued that the spread of AIDS would be halted if women
would stop wearing miniskirts (“It’s in Our Hands”). And just
this year, a strict Muslim father hired hitmen to kill his 21-year-old daughter
because she refused to stop wearing miniskirts. After he paid the gangsters the
equivalent of about $3,000, they kidnapped and shot her in the head on the outskirts
of St. Petersburg, Russia (“Daughter Killed”).
Twenty-first Century Miniskirts
While the miniskirt has been met with disapproval and even violence, the tiny
skirt shows no signs of disappearing. On the contrary, the miniskirt is still
heavily featured on Western catwalks and in fashion magazines—and it is
often shorter than ever. The phone company Samsung even introduced a new cell
phone in 2008 called the “Miniskirt Season 2” which, while looking
nothing like a miniskirt, is targeted toward women who like to “Talk, Play,
Love” (Evans 2008). The miniskirt—variously known as the “micro-mini,” “pelmet,” or “bondage” skirt—continues
to occupy a fascinating and paradoxical space in the fashion world as it teasingly
attempts to cover and reveal at the same time. In all of its contradictions and
reinventions, the miniskirt still provokes, challenges, and demands attention
from both men and women alike.
-- Posted May 25, 2009
References
Cawthorne, Nigel, ed. 1999. Key Moments in Fashion. Heron Quays, UK:
Octopus Publishing Group Limited.
“Daughter
Killed over Miniskirt.” News.com.au. April
23, 2009. Accessed: May 15, 2009.
Derbyshire, David. “Stone
Age Mini-Skirts and Prehistoric Women with a Passion for Fashion.” Dailymail.co.uk. November 2007. Accessed:
May 15, 2009.
Diamond, Jay, and Ellen Diamond. 2006. The World of Fashion. 3rd ed.
New York, NY: Fairchild Publications, Inc.
Evans, Mike. “Samsung’s Latest Phone is the Miniskirt.” MobileMentalism.com.
March 20, 2008. Accessed: May 16, 2009.
Gandolfi, Fiora. 1989. Skirts and More Skirts. Modena, Italy: Zanfi
Editori srl.
“It’s in Our Hands: Stop Violence against Women.” Amnesty
International. 2004. Accessed: May 16, 2009.
Lehnert, Gertrude. 2000. A History of Fashion in the 20th Century.
Cologne, Germany: Konemann Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Olsen, James Stuart. 1999. Historical Dictionary of the 1960s. Santa
Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press Group.
Reilly, Edward J. 2003. The 1960s. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press
Group.
Ross, Robert. 2008. Clothing: A Global History. Boston, MA: Polity.
Steele, Valerie. 1997. Fifty Years of Fashion: New Look to Now. New
Haven, CT: Yale University.
Weaver, Janice. 2003. From Head to Toe: Bound Feet, Bathing Suits, and Other
Bizarre and Beautiful Things. Toronto, Canada: Tundra Books.
White, Nicola and Ian Griffiths. 2000. The Fashion Business. Oxford,
UK: Berg Publishers.