The invention of the automobile in the late nineteenth
century created a need to protect motorists from the potentially enormous
financial loss from operating a car. While the automobile certainly
revolutionized American society both economically and culturally, it can also
be a dangerous instrument, inflicting death, personal injury, and property
damage...and the automobile itself can also be damaged or stolen. Economically,
the potential losses associated with driving an automobile can be significant
(Stellwagen 1926). With the knowledge that operating an automobile is
potentially economically devastating, and acting on the assumption that driving
an automobile is a privilege and not a right, policy makers required motorists
to purchase auto insurance coverage to protect innocent third parties as well
as the at-fault motorist from liability.
Though car insurance obligations vary from state to state,
every state in the U.S. requires mandatory car insurance. The resulting tension
between financial responsibility and compulsory liability statutes highlights
the struggle in the American psyche itself between freedom to do what one
pleases and the need to regulate some things for the good of the whole.
Consequently, automobile insurance companies have become a leviathan entity
enmeshed with enormous political implications (Long 2007). The history of
automobile insurance gestures towards a complex interplay of financial
responsibility laws, compulsory insurance laws, and uninsured motorist coverage
based largely on the principles of tort law (Brainard 1961).
Rooted in Ancient Marine Insurance
The concept of auto insurance is fundamentally a tort
system. Tort law falls under civil law and specifically involves personal
injury laws. There really is no agreement as to a single definition of a tort.
Etymologically, however, the term means a “wrong” (from the Latin tortus, “twisted,” to the French tort, “wrong”). All torts are wrongs involving damage to a
protected interest (Braindard 1961). In other words, a tort occurs when someone
either deliberately or through negligence harms another person or group. The
concept of torts and, by extension, automobile insurance can roughly be traced
back to ancient mariners. In 3000 B.C., merchants on China’s rivers
deliberately spread a given cargo among several ships to reduce the potential
loss due to either sinking or piracy.
In the Babylonian kingdom circa 2000 B.C., the Code of
Hammurabi, one of the first written codes of law in history, provided the first
written record of insurance in the form of “bottomry.” In the contract of
“bottomry,” lenders advanced the ship-owning merchant the full cost of the
cargo. If the voyage was a success, the ship owner repaid the bank at a certain
interest rate which included a premium to reflect the risk of loss. If the ship
was lost, the lender forgave the loan (Jaffe and Russell 1997). Traders whose cargoes were advanced by
merchants were thus protected from debt in case the cargo was lost. This
practice spread throughout the Mediterranean region until finally the Roman
edict Lex Aquilia (circa 300 B.C.) provided a general law of compensation for
direct and indirect injuries. This in turn was continued by the Roman Emperor
Justinian in the sixth century A.D. (Jorgensen 1970).
In addition, Greek, Indian, and Phoenician traders used an
ancient insurance called the “General Average.” According to a 700 B.C. written
reference, the General Average insurance involved a cooperative effort whereby
if cargo was compromised, the loss must be made good by all interests involved:
“That which has been destroyed of all shall be replaced by the contributions of
all” (Brainard 1961). In Europe during the eleventh and twelfth centuries,
Danish navigators began forming guilds whose role was to protect its members
against loss and damage at sea.
Auto Insurance and Socio-Economic Infrastructures
Auto insurance evolved from the interest marine insurance
had in protecting against financial loss. The tort notion of fault is so deeply
embedded in previous theories of insurance that auto insurance naturally also came
to rest on a fault system. What this means is that if there were an auto
accident, it would be determined who was at fault and then liability would be
assessed according to that determination. However, since there are
irresponsible drivers--or, in other words, drivers who don’t have the financial
capacity to pay--it is impossible to ensure that even though fault is assessed,
the injured person will be able to collect. Simply put, the problem is that of
the uncompensated drivers in a society that is unarguably an auto-centered
society (Long 2007).
The tremendous rise the automobile insurance industry is
related to a variety of factors, including the expansion of the U.S. economy,
the dramatic impact of the automobile on American life, and the rapid growth of
its supporting physical and legal infrastructure from road improvement to
driver licensing. Indeed, the rise of the “car culture” in the first half of
the twentieth century was accompanied by a surprising number of accidents on
the roadways (Rossi and Black Jr. 2001). The high rate of accidents on the
roads resulted in several political reactions. Beginning in earnest in the
early 1920s, the states and federal government increased funds to improve roads
and traffic control while also implementing stricter driver and vehicle
licensing requirements.
Insurance had always been offered to ease the socio-economic
losses associated with transportation, but now because the preferred mode of
transportation was the automobile and the number of motor vehicle related
fatalities was high, the states began to require that drivers cover the
liability they incurred while operating their cars. Perhaps the first move by
organized society to deal with the financial results of auto accidents came
with the compulsory liability insurance statue in Massachusetts in 1927 with
the objective to make all parties financially responsible. Most states would
pass similar laws by the 1940s which saw the end of WWII and a rapid increase
in the automobile industry, consequently expanding the need for financial responsibility
and mandatory insurance coverage laws for motorists. Today all states require
automobile insurance.
Auto insurance has become one of the most heavily regulated
businesses in U.S. history, and most countries outside the United States also now
require motorists to purchase auto insurance before driving on public roads.
The penalties for not acquiring insurance can be severe. Usually, the law requires
that a motorist have at least third-party insurance to protect others against
financial loss caused by the motorist's vehicle, while coverage against damage
to the motorist's own vehicle or person is usually optional. In doing this,
American insurance laws created an auto accident compensation system based on
personal responsibility that simply extended traditional insurance legal
principles embodied in tort law to a new technology: the auto (Long 2007).
Types of Car Insurance
The many different types of policies, along with unfamiliar
legal terminology, can initially be confusing (Rossi and Black 2001). There are five basic types of auto insurance coverage:
bodily injury liability, property damage liability, medical payment liability,
uninsured motorist liability, and collision and comprehensive coverage.
Bodily Injury Liability
Provides coverage for bodily injury claims from those whom a
motorist injures in an accident. In other words, this covers motorists if they
are at fault in an accident and the people in the other vehicle suffer injuries
exceeding their own personal injury coverage.
Property Damage Liability
Covers any property damages to third parties (such as damage
to the other person’s car or other personal property which a motorist causes or
is responsible for). Damage liability provides a fixed dollar amount of
coverage for damages that an insured driver becomes legally liable to pay due
to an accident or other negligence. The most important type of coverage
provided by automobile insurers is the liability coverage. Liability premiums
are higher and bring in more money than other coverages, and companies’ claims
losses are greatest in this area because the law tends to value lives more than
property (Rossi and Black 2001).
Medical Payments Liability
Provides medical payments to the policy owner and other
passengers in the policy owner’s car.
Uninsured Motorist Liability
Protects a motorist when the other, negligent driver has no
insurance or not enough insurance. Uninsured motorist insurance is meant only
to cover bodily injury and not property damage. It means that the insured is
really “double-insured” both against his own injury and also injury caused by
an uninsured motorist. The amount of coverage that a purchaser of automobile
insurance could secure against the acts of an uninsured motorist is the amount
required under the financial responsibility laws of the insured's state. State
law determines the definition of uninsured/underinsured and the corresponding
coverages.
Collision and Comprehensive Coverage
Insures against physical damage to a motorist’s car,
including collision and comprehensive coverage. Collision covers damage to the
insured’s car that is involved in an accident. Usually collision coverage
includes a deductible and provides payments to repair the damaged vehicle or
payments of the cash value of the car if the car is not repairable. Collision
coverage is usually optional. Comprehensive coverage provides coverage minus a
deductible for damage not considered collision, such as theft, fire, weather,
or impact with an animal (“Automobile Insurance” 2001).
Conclusion
The expansion of the automobile as a mass-produced means of
preferred travel has brought with it the great potential for destruction of
lives and property. In response to this, both the state and federal governments
require mandatory insurance coverage. The insurance industry, which had already
developed according to a system of tort law, has been applied to automobile
insurance laws. And those laws have evolved into an enormous political and
economic hydra that politicians and lawyers constantly critique and reform.
Currently, auto insurance is the only example of something that Americans are
required by law to buy (assuming they own cars), but it is provided exclusively
by private industry on a for-profit basis.
References
“Automobile Insurance: The Basic of Auto Insurance.” 2001. Better Business Bureau.
http://www.bbb.org/ALERTS/article.asp?ID=431.
Baird, Calvin. 1961. Automobile Insurance. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Jaffe, Dwight and Thomas Russell. 1997. “Catastrophe Insurance, Capital Markets, and
Uninsured Risks.” Journal of Risk and Insurance. 62.2. 225-230.
Jorgensen, Stig. 1970. “The Decline and Fall of the Law of Torts.” The American Journal of Comparative Law. 18.1.39-53.
Long, William. 2005. “Automobile History.
http://www.drbilllong.com/Insurance/HistoryI.html.
Rossi, John Paul and Samuel P. Black, Jr. 2001. Entrepreneurship and Innovation in
Automobile Insurance. New York, NY: Routledge.
Stellwagen, H.P. 1926. “Automobile Insurance.” Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science. 130: 154-162.